Author Archive for: CASTCorp

CASTCorp International

About CASTCorp International

A customary priest’s funeral mass for the Rev. Gerald Robinson, 76, convicted killer of Catholic nun, Sister Margaret Ann Pahl, was scheduled for June 11, 2014, in Toledo, Ohio, according to the Associated Press. Robinson died on July 4th in a prison hospice in Columbus where he had been since suffering a heart attack in late May. Relatives had sought a compassionate release order to return Robinson to Toledo to die, but that request was rejected by a federal judge the day before his death. Robinson had been serving a 15 years to life sentence for Pahl’s murder.

This is a landmark case from several perspectives. For the Catholic Church, this is the only documented case of a priest killing a nun and only the second homicide conviction of a priest in the United States. Also, because Robinson professed his innocence until his death and never ceased appealing the conviction, the Church never stripped him of his ordained priest status. For that reason, according to the Rev. Charles Ritter, administrator of the Diocese of Toledo, a diocesan priest’s funeral mass was due Robinson.

Of particular interest to us at CASTCorp International is the significant role one of our Partners, forensic animator Christopher Lorenzo, and computer forensic animation played in securing Fr. Robinson’s conviction. However, before we get to that let’s take a brief look at the facts of this fascinating case.

The 1980 murder of Sister Margaret, could only be described as brutal and ritualistic. She was strangled and stabbed more than 30 times inside the chapel building at the Toledo Mercy Hospital where both she and Robinson worked. Robinson, then 42, was the hospital chaplain and Pahl, 71, was caretaker of the chapel. Nine of the stab wounds were in the shape of an inverted cross and a smudge of blood was left on her forehead in what prosecutors would later argue was a mock anointing. Pahl was found covered in an alter cloth and her body and clothing, as reported in Wikipedia, were arranged in such a manner as to suggest that she had been sexually assaulted. In a twist of irony, Robinson presided over Pahl’s funeral mass four days after the murder.

Cover up or not?

Within the first two weeks of the investigation Robinson emerged as a prime suspect. Police had found a sword-shaped letter opener inside a desk drawer in his apartment. In addition to that, Robinson initially told police that someone had confessed to the murder, a statement he would later recant, admitting that the story was a fabrication. And, while Robinson was questioned, he was never charged. Allegations would emerge of a police cover-up involving then Deputy Police Chief Ray Vetter, purportedly a practicing Catholic. It was alleged that Vetter interrupted and disbanded a homicide investigators’ interview of Robinson some two weeks after the murder, allowing Robinson to walk out of police headquarters. It was also alleged that Vetter ordered detectives to surrender their reports to him and that some of those reports simply disappeared after that.

Cover-up or not, the active investigation died there and it remained a cold case with no new leads for 23 years. Then, in 2003, police received a letter from a woman using the name “Survivor Doe.” In her letter, Survivor Doe alleged that Robinson had sexually abused her when she was a child in a series of satanic ritual ceremonies that included human sacrifice. Police were never able to build a sexual abuse case around Survivor Doe’s allegations, but it did provide the impetus for a fresh team of investigators to revisit the Pahl case. Ultimately, investigators were able to establish that the patterns of blood stains on the altar cloth matched patterns found on the letter opener seized from Robinson’s desk drawer in 1980. And, thanks to some new technology not available to investigators back then, a connection between the killing and the letter opener was established.

Robinson was arrested for the murder of Sister Margaret 24 years after the crime. At his 2006 trial, prosecutors argued that the motive behind the killing was Robinson’s ongoing and unresolved anger toward Pahl stemming from what he felt was her overly domineering personality.

The trial itself included some relatively uncommon forensic technology, for its day. More than a quarter century after the murder, the crime scene – the hospital chapel – was no longer in existence. Prosecutors had to turn to architect and forensic animator Christopher Lorenzo to help present a compelling visual statement about where and how the crime occurred. Chris created a 3D animation of the crime scene and Robinson’s movement within it. Through his animation Chris was able to demonstrate how Robinson navigated from point to point within the chapel, murdered Sister Margaret, and all within the time-frame the prosecution claimed the murder took place.

It should be noted that throughout his trial and right through to his death, Robinson maintained his innocence.

Read More

Edward Clinton Stevens (1927-2014)

With great sadness and deep sense of loss, we must report the passing of Ed Stevens, former San Diego Police Department Homicide Lieutenant, Atlas Hotels Director of Corporate Security and most recently, Supervising Consultant for cold case investigations and hotel/resort security management with our group. Ed lost his battle with cancer on Tuesday, May 6, 2014, at his home in El Cajon, California. His family was near his side. His final wish was to throw a baseball to grandson Shane (age 8) one last time. He fulfilled that wish just a few days before his passing.

Ed was born on June 4, 1927, in his family home on Dewey Street in the San Diego neighborhood now known as Barrio Logan. While attending San Diego Vocational High School, Ed convinced his parents to allow him to enlist in the Navy in 1944 at the age of 17. There was a war to fight and he became an Aviation Ordnance man, serving in the Pacific Theatre during the final year of World War II. In 1950, Ed launched his first professional career, joining the San Diego Police Department as an officer. His first assignment was a walking beat in downtown, but as his career progressed, it became apparent that solving murder mysteries and providing closure for the families of murder victims was his passion and his calling. In an era preceding the advent of DNA evidence, Ed achieved a case cancellation rate of 96%, the kind of incredible accomplishment from which legends are made. Even in retirement, Ed was summoned to consult on some of San Diego County’s highest profile homicide cases by 7 different law enforcement agencies. In all, from 1964 to 2014, Ed was involved in more than 600 homicide investigations as an investigator, case manager and consultant.

After 28 years with the SDPD, Ed launched his second career in 1978, accepting the position of Director of Corporate Security for San Diego-based Atlas Hotels Corporation. For 15 years, he managed all security operations for 11 hotel properties in the U.S. and Mexico, which included as many as 52 armed security officers and supervisors. As security director, Ed was responsible for establishing all corporate security policies and procedures, conducting all corporate investigations, including interior and exterior criminal offenses as well as guest and employee accidents and injuries, hiring all supervisory personnel and maintaining liaison with national and local law enforcement agencies. He pioneered the application of K9 security operations and authored three operational manuals for Atlas Hotels.

Aside from the excitement and camaraderie of police and security work and spending time with his family, Ed loved baseball, tennis and German shepherds.

He is survived by his wife Sharon, son Jim (a SDPD K9 officer), daughter Gilda, son-in-law Jim Leslie, former wife Nancy, former daughter-in-law Martha Sainz (a SDPD Lieutenant), and three grandsons, Shane, Josh and Kris. Following a celebration of Ed’s life by friends, family and co-workers, Ed was laid to rest at Singing Hills Memorial Park, El Cajon, California, on May 12, 2014.

Read More

Radical Jihadists Engaged in Stealth Campaign to Silence Free Speech

Washington, D.C. – The Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) – in a full-page ad running in the New York Times today – cautioned that Islamist terrorists are successfully suppressing free speech to the grave detriment of U.S. national security. “Radical Islamist terrorists are determined to eliminate the West through horrifying brutality and a stealth jihad against our values in the name of Allah,” IPT Executive Director and Founder Steven Emerson said. “Perhaps most chilling is that the U.S. government and civic institutions at the highest levels are capitulating to their aggressive censorship campaign.” The ad, titled “Still Here. Still Free. But For How Long?” discusses the ongoing global activity of radical Islamist terror organizations and the great pains that their sympathizers are taking to censor debate. The advertisement cites the White House eliminating the term “radical Islam” and similar language in its counter-terrorism programs. It also discusses jihadist terror organizations effectively silencing discourse on college campuses and in media that might offend followers of Islam. “How is it possible for U.S. citizens to engage in the necessary debate over Islamist terror when U.S. leaders ban its most descriptive and accurate characterizations?” asked former House Intelligence Committee Chairman and IPT Shillman Senior Fellow Pete Hoekstra. “Denying the overtly religious motivations behind their barbaric attacks minimizes the true nature of a strong and terrifying enemy just waiting for the right opportunity to strike again.” Editor’s note: A copy of the ad running in Wednesday’s New York Times follows below:

We join in commemorating today’s official opening of the National September 11 Memorial Museum as part of the on-going national healing process. The threat from radical Islamist terrorists who killed thousands of innocent Americans on Sept. 11, 2001 is as real today as it was then, if not more so. It is undeniable that those behind the 9-11 attacks and other Islamic terrorism were motivated by radical Islamic ideology. To deny the truth behind the religious motivation of Islamic terrorists is an insult to the memory of the 9-11 victims and all other victims of Islamic terrorism. Islamist terrorists were behind the bombing of Madrid’s commuter train system in 2004; they attacked London’s subways in 2005; they opened fire on innocents in a Kenyan shopping mall in 2013. U.K. jihadists hacked a British soldier to death that same year. Just weeks ago, Nigerian Islamists kidnapped hundreds of schoolgirls and forced them to convert to Islam. Radical Islamist ideology clearly motivated all of the attacks – the perpetrators said so unambiguously. The 9-11 hijackers themselves invoked the term “jihad” or holy war which they pledged to wage against Jews and Christians. And the leader of Nigeria’s Boko Haram recently said: “This war is against Christians, I mean Christians, generally, the infidels. Allah says we should finish them when we get them… I am working for Allah and will die for it.” When a killer like Nidal Hasan screams “Allahu Akbar”—God is Greatest –before opening fire on his fellow soldiers at Fort Hood, we must not avert our eyes to the radical Islamist motivation behind his murderous attack. The Fort Hood massacre has never been classified as a terrorist act; rather, it was designated as a case of “workplace violence.” Yet, Islamist groups, masquerading as “civil rights” groups, have embarked on a bullying campaign to censor the word “Islam” when discussing Islamic terrorism. And the media plays a key role in this deception by legitimizing these radical Islamic groups and not exposing them. This is the new form of the jihadist threat we face. It’s an attack on one of our most sacred freedoms—free speech—and it endangers our very national security. How can we win the war against terrorism if we can’t even name the enemy? Those who dare to talk about jihad as holy war, or invoke the term Islamic terrorists, or discuss the religious motivation behind Islamist group are slandered as “Islamophobes” or bigots. The courageous Muslim voices who dare criticize radical Islam find themselves scurrilously attacked and slandered by national Islamist groups as turncoats – “Uncle Toms”—when these moderates should be lauded as heroes. The chill on free speech takes an even more dangerous turn when prosecutors charged with keeping us safe are prohibited from investigating the religious justifications for terrorist attacks. Scandalously, the FBI has succumbed to pressure from these Islamist groups in purging and destroying thousands of books, pamphlets, papers and PowerPoint presentations that were deemed to be “offensive to Islam.” Moreover, the Obama Administration has effectively prohibited the use of the term “radical Islam” and similar language in its counter- terrorism programs. This takes the incursions on free speech to a new low: our leaders deliberately avoiding the identification of the enemy. American Islamist groups are continuing to succeed in curbing free speech. New examples seem to pop up each week. Brandeis University capitulated to an organized campaign to rescind plans to give Ayaan Hirsi Ali – a tireless campaigner against abuses of women in Muslim cultures – an honorary degree. ABC Family Channel killed a pilot TV series, called “Alice in Arabia,” about an American teenage girl forced to live against her will in Saudi Arabia. Universities have canceled screenings of a documentary called “Honor Diaries.” In deceptive public statements, Islamist groups claim they are against “terrorism.” But when asked if they specifically condemn “Islamic terrorist groups” they refuse to acknowledge the Islamist motivation, a motivation the Islamic terrorists openly admit themselves. Islamist groups do backflips to avoid discussing the role their shared radical ideology plays in terrorist attacks. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which the FBI alleges has ties to Hamas, provided a compelling example at a May 8 news conference when asked to condemn Boko Haram: “What’s happening there is not because Islam is the problem,” said the CAIR official. He continued,” And we’re tired of people coming on television and examining, ‘Well where does this ideology come from?’ This ideology comes from nowhere…. Islam is not the problem; extremism and violent extremism is the problem, which is a result of many other factors of people that are in Africa that they’re facing, whether it’s poverty, whether it’s lack of resources, whether it’s the exploitation of their resources by other people.” This is sheer nonsense. And dangerous when the Obama Administration collaborates with both Islamist groups and the national media in enforcing the censorship agenda of these Islamist groups. The Investigative Project on Terrorism, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit research center, has spent years shining a spotlight on this campaign of stifling free speech and censoring an open discussion of who our enemies are. Let the opening of the National September 11 Memorial Museum mark the day that we honor our lost compatriots by demanding an end to the censorship about the religious justification for Islamic terrorists, acknowledged by government counter-terrorism reports as the most dangerous threat to our national security. This article has been reprinted with the permission of Mr. Steve Emerson, Founder and Executive Director of The Investigative Project on Terrorism.

Read More